Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Deviant Member PascalMale/Netherlands Recent Activity
Deviant for 3 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 47 Deviations 57 Comments 2,350 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Groups

Activity


Technocratic Combine Contender Strider by packie1984
Technocratic Combine Contender Strider
development on the original paradox mod may have stopped, but it and the echoes spin of mod are still being slowly developed as lore projects to my knowledge. So for me it is still a good inspiration to draw stuff for.

Also, I've been in a bit of an artistic slump lately I couldn't get the ideas I had onto paper, but this one worked out well in my opinion. Let's hope it is a sign of a positive trend.

Anyways, this is a design for the contender strider SPG of the technocratic combine (an echoes faction). I may have deviated quite a bit from the original design specifications, but at it's core, it is the triple-gunned light artillery walker as described on it's lore page
Loading...
Wall Wyvern by packie1984
Wall Wyvern
A drawing of a wyvern that I made on my wall over the course of two evenings this week
Loading...
full title: somewhat intoxicated ramblings possibly concerning life, the universe and/or everything

unfortunately, that was to long to fit into the real title :(

I may make a series out of this, but don't expect much, as it requires me to be:
a) intoxicated, (not that difficult, but still)
b) in a mood for writing (a very rare occurrence)
furthermore, I am very slow in accomplishing promises to myself (the painting on my wall is still a sketch, and starting to use my drawing tablet has come as far as installing it, to give a few examples).

let's start (may concern scientific stuff);
Life has never passed trough a RNA-dominated stage. the theory is that life evolved from mycells containing self-replicating RNA. These would out-compete other mycells by introducing polymeric RNA which would retain more water and lipids to make larger mycells and reproduce (due to osmotic forces and stuff (this should be considered as a quick and dirty explanation of complex biochemical interactions by a somewhat drunk guy)). I think this is unlikely as it is easier to polymerize large amounts of aminoacids than nucleotides, as aminoacids are more abundant, and thus would play a more dominant role. however, as proto-life, interactions would probably not be as absolute as predator-prey for example, allowing "proto genetic information" to be passed on even if it would be incorporated in another mycell. dominance would probably be achieved by indeed a self-replicating RNA-molecule, however, it would probably need the ability to catalyze the polymerization of aminoacids to achieve dominance, allowing the fromation of life as we know it based on that interaction. (this stuff would probably make more sense to somebody who's got an idea what I'm talking about)

continuing with biochemistry, but this time applied to xenobiology, or how I would like to make to make the argument that classifying life on earth as carbon-based is somewhat misleading. Yes, for all life as we know it carbon is the main functional element. however, the driving force behind nearly all biological reactions is the entropy of water, a combination of hydrophobic and hydrophillic interactions and the tendency of all particles to "prefer" to move freely (thermodynamics and stuff). Now (liquid) water is an amazing chemical, with many special properties, with it's abundance (on earth) possibly as most important. Carbon happens to have amazing functional properties in the same range as water is liquid, and (very important for the entropy of water) polarity. This all makes me skeptical of theoretical non-carbon based life forms (such as silica based life), as while another element can possibly have similar functional properties as carbon in different conditions, what would provide the driving force if not liquid water?

finally for tonight, life on other planets in the solar system: Mars is most popular in the quest to find other life in the universe. logical, as there is a lot of evidence that there is/has been liquid water on mars (see the previous section(s) as to why this is important). In my opinion in this quest Venus is often overlooked. not unsurprising, as it many people would probably consider it as a rather accurate representation of "hell". To me, these hellish conditions, seem almost perfect for the conditions that would create life. So I am of the belief that if liquid water could be found on Venus, there will almost certainly be life in it, and probably more interesting than the remnants of life that may be found on Mars.

That's enough for this night, mostly stuff that's close to me as a biotechnology student (I warned you it would contain science). I may talk about other stuff if I continue this as a sort of series
full title: somewhat intoxicated ramblings possibly concerning life, the universe and/or everything

unfortunately, that was to long to fit into the real title :(

I may make a series out of this, but don't expect much, as it requires me to be:
a) intoxicated, (not that difficult, but still)
b) in a mood for writing (a very rare occurrence)
furthermore, I am very slow in accomplishing promises to myself (the painting on my wall is still a sketch, and starting to use my drawing tablet has come as far as installing it, to give a few examples).

let's start (may concern scientific stuff);
Life has never passed trough a RNA-dominated stage. the theory is that life evolved from mycells containing self-replicating RNA. These would out-compete other mycells by introducing polymeric RNA which would retain more water and lipids to make larger mycells and reproduce (due to osmotic forces and stuff (this should be considered as a quick and dirty explanation of complex biochemical interactions by a somewhat drunk guy)). I think this is unlikely as it is easier to polymerize large amounts of aminoacids than nucleotides, as aminoacids are more abundant, and thus would play a more dominant role. however, as proto-life, interactions would probably not be as absolute as predator-prey for example, allowing "proto genetic information" to be passed on even if it would be incorporated in another mycell. dominance would probably be achieved by indeed a self-replicating RNA-molecule, however, it would probably need the ability to catalyze the polymerization of aminoacids to achieve dominance, allowing the fromation of life as we know it based on that interaction. (this stuff would probably make more sense to somebody who's got an idea what I'm talking about)

continuing with biochemistry, but this time applied to xenobiology, or how I would like to make to make the argument that classifying life on earth as carbon-based is somewhat misleading. Yes, for all life as we know it carbon is the main functional element. however, the driving force behind nearly all biological reactions is the entropy of water, a combination of hydrophobic and hydrophillic interactions and the tendency of all particles to "prefer" to move freely (thermodynamics and stuff). Now (liquid) water is an amazing chemical, with many special properties, with it's abundance (on earth) possibly as most important. Carbon happens to have amazing functional properties in the same range as water is liquid, and (very important for the entropy of water) polarity. This all makes me skeptical of theoretical non-carbon based life forms (such as silica based life), as while another element can possibly have similar functional properties as carbon in different conditions, what would provide the driving force if not liquid water?

finally for tonight, life on other planets in the solar system: Mars is most popular in the quest to find other life in the universe. logical, as there is a lot of evidence that there is/has been liquid water on mars (see the previous section(s) as to why this is important). In my opinion in this quest Venus is often overlooked. not unsurprising, as it many people would probably consider it as a rather accurate representation of "hell". To me, these hellish conditions, seem almost perfect for the conditions that would create life. So I am of the belief that if liquid water could be found on Venus, there will almost certainly be life in it, and probably more interesting than the remnants of life that may be found on Mars.

That's enough for this night, mostly stuff that's close to me as a biotechnology student (I warned you it would contain science). I may talk about other stuff if I continue this as a sort of series
full title: somewhat intoxicated ramblings possibly concerning life, the universe and/or everything

unfortunately, that was to long to fit into the real title :(

I may make a series out of this, but don't expect much, as it requires me to be:
a) intoxicated, (not that difficult, but still)
b) in a mood for writing (a very rare occurrence)
furthermore, I am very slow in accomplishing promises to myself (the painting on my wall is still a sketch, and starting to use my drawing tablet has come as far as installing it, to give a few examples).

let's start (may concern scientific stuff);
Life has never passed trough a RNA-dominated stage. the theory is that life evolved from mycells containing self-replicating RNA. These would out-compete other mycells by introducing polymeric RNA which would retain more water and lipids to make larger mycells and reproduce (due to osmotic forces and stuff (this should be considered as a quick and dirty explanation of complex biochemical interactions by a somewhat drunk guy)). I think this is unlikely as it is easier to polymerize large amounts of aminoacids than nucleotides, as aminoacids are more abundant, and thus would play a more dominant role. however, as proto-life, interactions would probably not be as absolute as predator-prey for example, allowing "proto genetic information" to be passed on even if it would be incorporated in another mycell. dominance would probably be achieved by indeed a self-replicating RNA-molecule, however, it would probably need the ability to catalyze the polymerization of aminoacids to achieve dominance, allowing the fromation of life as we know it based on that interaction. (this stuff would probably make more sense to somebody who's got an idea what I'm talking about)

continuing with biochemistry, but this time applied to xenobiology, or how I would like to make to make the argument that classifying life on earth as carbon-based is somewhat misleading. Yes, for all life as we know it carbon is the main functional element. however, the driving force behind nearly all biological reactions is the entropy of water, a combination of hydrophobic and hydrophillic interactions and the tendency of all particles to "prefer" to move freely (thermodynamics and stuff). Now (liquid) water is an amazing chemical, with many special properties, with it's abundance (on earth) possibly as most important. Carbon happens to have amazing functional properties in the same range as water is liquid, and (very important for the entropy of water) polarity. This all makes me skeptical of theoretical non-carbon based life forms (such as silica based life), as while another element can possibly have similar functional properties as carbon in different conditions, what would provide the driving force if not liquid water?

finally for tonight, life on other planets in the solar system: Mars is most popular in the quest to find other life in the universe. logical, as there is a lot of evidence that there is/has been liquid water on mars (see the previous section(s) as to why this is important). In my opinion in this quest Venus is often overlooked. not unsurprising, as it many people would probably consider it as a rather accurate representation of "hell". To me, these hellish conditions, seem almost perfect for the conditions that would create life. So I am of the belief that if liquid water could be found on Venus, there will almost certainly be life in it, and probably more interesting than the remnants of life that may be found on Mars.

That's enough for this night, mostly stuff that's close to me as a biotechnology student (I warned you it would contain science). I may talk about other stuff if I continue this as a sort of series
full title: somewhat intoxicated ramblings possibly concerning life, the universe and/or everything

unfortunately, that was to long to fit into the real title :(

I may make a series out of this, but don't expect much, as it requires me to be:
a) intoxicated, (not that difficult, but still)
b) in a mood for writing (a very rare occurrence)
furthermore, I am very slow in accomplishing promises to myself (the painting on my wall is still a sketch, and starting to use my drawing tablet has come as far as installing it, to give a few examples).

let's start (may concern scientific stuff);
Life has never passed trough a RNA-dominated stage. the theory is that life evolved from mycells containing self-replicating RNA. These would out-compete other mycells by introducing polymeric RNA which would retain more water and lipids to make larger mycells and reproduce (due to osmotic forces and stuff (this should be considered as a quick and dirty explanation of complex biochemical interactions by a somewhat drunk guy)). I think this is unlikely as it is easier to polymerize large amounts of aminoacids than nucleotides, as aminoacids are more abundant, and thus would play a more dominant role. however, as proto-life, interactions would probably not be as absolute as predator-prey for example, allowing "proto genetic information" to be passed on even if it would be incorporated in another mycell. dominance would probably be achieved by indeed a self-replicating RNA-molecule, however, it would probably need the ability to catalyze the polymerization of aminoacids to achieve dominance, allowing the fromation of life as we know it based on that interaction. (this stuff would probably make more sense to somebody who's got an idea what I'm talking about)

continuing with biochemistry, but this time applied to xenobiology, or how I would like to make to make the argument that classifying life on earth as carbon-based is somewhat misleading. Yes, for all life as we know it carbon is the main functional element. however, the driving force behind nearly all biological reactions is the entropy of water, a combination of hydrophobic and hydrophillic interactions and the tendency of all particles to "prefer" to move freely (thermodynamics and stuff). Now (liquid) water is an amazing chemical, with many special properties, with it's abundance (on earth) possibly as most important. Carbon happens to have amazing functional properties in the same range as water is liquid, and (very important for the entropy of water) polarity. This all makes me skeptical of theoretical non-carbon based life forms (such as silica based life), as while another element can possibly have similar functional properties as carbon in different conditions, what would provide the driving force if not liquid water?

finally for tonight, life on other planets in the solar system: Mars is most popular in the quest to find other life in the universe. logical, as there is a lot of evidence that there is/has been liquid water on mars (see the previous section(s) as to why this is important). In my opinion in this quest Venus is often overlooked. not unsurprising, as it many people would probably consider it as a rather accurate representation of "hell". To me, these hellish conditions, seem almost perfect for the conditions that would create life. So I am of the belief that if liquid water could be found on Venus, there will almost certainly be life in it, and probably more interesting than the remnants of life that may be found on Mars.

That's enough for this night, mostly stuff that's close to me as a biotechnology student (I warned you it would contain science). I may talk about other stuff if I continue this as a sort of series

deviantID

packie1984's Profile Picture
packie1984
Pascal
Netherlands

AdCast - Ads from the Community

×

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconcthelmax:
cthelmax Featured By Owner Oct 29, 2014
Thanks for the fave :)
Reply
:icondan338:
dan338 Featured By Owner Jul 5, 2014
thanks for the fave on "Fly by"
Reply
:iconbulletchamber:
BulletChamber Featured By Owner Apr 25, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Brilliant aircraft designs you've got.
Reply
:iconpackie1984:
packie1984 Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2014
thanks, I just love doing them
Reply
:iconbulletchamber:
BulletChamber Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Keep it up. They're really good.
Reply
:icondan338:
dan338 Featured By Owner Feb 11, 2014
thanks for the fave
Reply
:iconthe-necromancer:
The-Necromancer Featured By Owner Dec 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Thankee kindly for the watch.
Reply
:icondan338:
dan338 Featured By Owner Nov 26, 2013
thanks for the fave
Reply
:iconcthelmax:
cthelmax Featured By Owner Nov 26, 2013
Thanks for the watch :)
Reply
:iconseancornishart:
SeanCornishART Featured By Owner Nov 1, 2013  Student Filmographer
Thanks for adding me to your watched list! :)
Reply
Add a Comment: